Analisis Literasi Sains pada Buku Teks Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v8i2.62530
Abstract
This study is a qualitative descriptive study with the aim of knowing the scope of scientific literacy as knowledge, investigation of the nature of science, ways of thinking, and the interaction of Science Technology and society in chemistry textbook for year 10based on Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. The sample of this research is a science book of kurikulum merdeka which contains chemistry material from four different publishers. The scope of scientific literacy aspects of science as knowledge in chemistry textbooks foryear10 has a very high emergence of 63.35%. The scope of scientific literacy aspects of science as an investigation of the nature of Science in chemistry textbooks class X has the second highest occurrence of 27.57%.The scope of scientific literacy aspects of science as a way of thinking of chemistry textbooks for year 10 have the third largest occurrence of 6.37%. The scope of scientific literacy aspects of science as the interaction of Science Technology and society in chemistry textbooks for year 10 has the lowest occurrence of 2.71%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdulkarim, A. 2017. “Analisis Isi Buku Teks Dan Implikasinya Dalam Membedakan Keterampilan Berfikir Siswa”. Jurnal Forum Pendidikan. Vol 23, No 2, pp. 118- 132.
Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. 2021. Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.
Abimbola, I. O., and Baba, S. 1996. Misconceptions & Alternative Conceptions in Science Textbooks: The Role of Teachers as Filters. The American Biology Teacher
Aditya, F.R. 2022. Analisis Kategori indikator Literasi Sains Pada Materi Sel Dalam Buku Pegangan Siswa. Berkala Ilmia Pendidikan Biologi. Surabaya.
Akcay, Behiye and Hakan Akcay. 2015. “Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) Instruction on Student Understanding of the Nature of Science and Attitudes toward Science”. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), vol. 3, no. 1.
Anggaraena, Y., Felicia N., & Ginanto D. 2021. Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Edisi 1. Kemendikbud.
Ainia, D. K. 2020. Merdeka Belajar dalam Pandangan Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan Relevensinya bagi Pengembangan Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia. Yogyakarta.
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. 2002. Universal Characteristics of EFL/ESL Textbooks: A Step Towards Systematic Textbook Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal.
Arikunto, S. 2019. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi.Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Ball, S. Maguire, M. & Braun, A. 2012. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chiappetta, E., Sethna, G.H., & Fillman,D. A 1991. A Quantitative Analysis of High School Chemistry Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes and Expository Learning Aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Dewi & Wajdi. 2021. Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi.
Echols, J. M., & Shadily, H. 2006. Kamus Inggris-Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fadilah,dkk., 2020 Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan NOSLiT. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan biologi. Jawa Tengah.
Hayat, B., & Yusuf, S. 2011. Benchmark International Mutu Pendidikan. Bandung: Humaniora.
Hazen, R.M., & Trefil, J. 2009. Science Matter: Achieving Scientific Literacy. United States: Anchor Books.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmac, M. 2009. The Meaning of Science Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Edication.
Hornby, A S. 2003. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemendikbud. 2017. Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta Timur.
King, K. P. 2002. Science Teaching and Literacy, A century of Growth. New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Komalasari, Kokom. 2013. Pembelajaran Kontekstul : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung : PT Refika Adiatama.
Marisa, S., Irwandi D., & Muslim B. 2020. Analisis Buku Teks Kimia Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri Kelas XI Berdasarkan Indikator Literasi Sains. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia. Jakarta.
Meuthia, H., & Ahmad, R. 2021. Analisis Aspek-Aspek Literasi Sains Pada Buku Kurikulum 2013 Tema 1 Kelas Iv Sd. Jems (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 9(1), 86–98.
Miller, J. D. 1983. Science Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. The MIT Press. 202248052.
Muslich, M. 2010. Text Book Writing Dasar-Dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Jogjakarta: Ar-ruzz Media
Nazir, M. 2014. Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Ni’mah, F. 2019. Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia : Where are we ? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(10), 23–30.
OECD. 2016. PISA 2015. Result in Focus. OECD Publishing
Onyema, Edeh Michael, 2020. Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Educatio. Journal of Education and Practice.
Parlindungan S, dkk, 2017. Improing Secondar School Students' Scient ific Literacy Abilit Through The Design Of Better Science Tetbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education vol. 14, issue 4.
Poedjiadi, A. 2010. Sains Teknologi Masyarakat: Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Bermuatan Nilai. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Prastowo, A. 2015. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
Qodratillah, M. T. 2011. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia untuk Pelajar. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sanjaya, W. 2011. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Shamos, M. H. 1995. The Myth of Scientific Literacy. America: Rutgers University Press.
Sitepu, B.P. 2012. Penulisan Buku Teks Pelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Steven M. Autieri, Aidin Amirshokoohi, & Mahsa Kazempour, “The Science- Technology-Society Framework for Achieving Scientific Literacy: an Overview of the Existing Literature”. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 1, (2016)
Sudaryono. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono.2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.CV.
Suhartono S. 2016. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan Persoalan Eksistensi dan Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Suriasumantri, J. S. 2005. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Sutrisna N,. 2021. Analisis literasi Kemampuan Perserta didik SMA di Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian.
Tarigan, H. G. & Tarigan, D. 2009. Telaah Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. 2011. Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
Upahi J. E., Rilwan Gbadamosi & V. Boniface. 2017. “Scientific Literacy Themes Coverage in the Nigerian Senior School Chemistry Curriculum”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 14, no. 2.
Wilkinson, J. 1999. A Quantitative Analysis of Physics Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes. Research in Science Education.
Yuliyanti, T.E, & Rusilowati, A. 2014. Analisis Buku Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XI Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains Di Kabupaten Tegal. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 3(2), 69-72.
Zulfiani, Tonih Feronika, dan Kinkin Suartini. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Sains. Ciputat: Lembaga Penelitian UIN Jakarta.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 184 times | PDF view : 6 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal dipublikasikan oleh: Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar
Alamat JL. Bonto Langkasa Gunung Sari Makassar, 90222
Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia.Phone 082393643737/085145825311/085242228678
CER UNM Indexed by:
Chemistry Education Review (CER) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.