Optimizing Public Services in the Digital Society in Indonesia

Susilawati Susilawati(1*),

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


This research paper aims to explore the potential for optimizing public services in the context of the digital society in Indonesia. The rapid advancement of technology and the increasing adoption of digital platforms have created new opportunities for governments to improve service delivery, enhance efficiency, and foster citizen engagement. The study investigates the current state of public services in Indonesia, identifies challenges and barriers, and proposes strategies to optimize these services using digital solutions. By leveraging technology and digital platforms, Indonesia can transform its public service delivery to meet the evolving needs and expectations of its citizens.


public services; digital society; public sector

Full Text:



Araujo, L. M. de, Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital leadership in business organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.18

Arayankalam, J., Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2020). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 102203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102203

Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016

Bartlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from local government. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 107–121.

Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M., & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003

Bryson, J. M. (2010). The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and Performance. Public Administration Review, 70(December), 255–267.

Cai, C., Qiu, R., & Tu, Y. (2022). Role of Digital Economy in Rebuilding and Sustaining the Space Governance Mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 828406. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828406

Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100(April), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035

Crego, M., & Bataller, C. (2012). Biometrics boost business outcomes and security in public services. Biometric Technology Today, 2012(3), 8–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(12)70073-5

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dalton, T. C., & Dalton, L. C. (1988). The politics of measuring public sector performance: productivity and the public organization. In Promoting productivity in the public sector (pp. 19–65). Springer.

Davis, J. (2004). Corruption in Public Service Delivery: Experience from South Asia’s Water and Sanitation Sector. World Development, 32(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.003

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Revisited. In Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347

Drezgić, S., Žiković, S., & Tomljanović, M. (2019). Economics of Digital Transformation (Issue February).

Edwards, S., Nolan, A., Henderson, M., Grieshaber, S., Highfield, K., Salamon, A., Skouteris, H., & Straker, L. (2020). Rationale, Design and Methods Protocol for Participatory Design of an Online Tool to Support Industry Service Provision Regarding Digital Technology Use ‘with, by and for’ Young Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238819

Gracia, D. B., & Arino, L. V. C. (2015). Rebuilding public trust in government administrations through e-government actions. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reimke.2014.07.001

Joda, T., Yeung, A. W. K., Hung, K., Zitzmann, N. U., & Bornstein, M. M. (2021). Disruptive Innovation in Dentistry: What It Is and What Could Be Next. Journal of Dental Research, 100(5), 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520978774

Kobylińska, U. (2015). Public sector innovativeness in Poland and in Spain–comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(2).

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976

Mazzucato, M., & Kattel, R. (2020). COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), graa031. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031

Ratten, V. (2018). Social entrepreneurship through digital communication in farming. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-07-2017-0045

Santoso, R. S., Rostyaningsih, D., & Lestari, H. (2021). Public Policy Analysis: Problem Exploration and Recommendation to Public Service Innovation in Surakarta City Government. ICISPE 2020, October 09-10.

Sebyan Black, I., & Fennelly, L. J. (2021). Chapter 6 - Public versus private investigative interviews (I. Sebyan Black & L. J. B. T.-I. and the A. of the I. (Fourth E. Fennelly (eds.); pp. 45–57). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822192-1.00006-4

Seidle, B., Fernandez, S., & Perry, J. L. (2016). Do leadership training and development make a difference in the public sector? A panel study. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 603–613.

Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00922013.1975.11000035

Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2016). Complexity of innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Management Review, 18(3), 392–416.

Wart, M. Van, & Dicke, L. A. (2008). Administrative Leadership in the Public Sector. ME. Sharpe Armonk.

Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Busaidy, M. (2016). Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: The lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006

Zekos, G. I. (2003). MNEs, globalisation and digital economy: legal and economic aspects. Managerial Law, 45(1/2), 1–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550310770875

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 75 times | PDF view : 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Susilawati Susilawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.