Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Pattigalloang adalah Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah dan Pemikiran Kesejarahan dan ilmu-ilmu sosial dengan ISSN 2355-2840


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Pattingalloang diterbitkan 4 kali satu tahun



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethic

Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review processareblind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account inrevieware relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readabilityandlanguage.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringementandplagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Responsibilities of editors

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture ofa research’sfunding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solelyonethe papers’ importance, originality, clarityandrelevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewersandboard members.

Responsibilities of the authors

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

    Responsibilities of the Reviewers
  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviewers must review articles according to their field of expertise
  3. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  4. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  5. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  6. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  8. The reviewer must provide recommendations on the results of the article review


Peer Review Process

Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by double blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully between 1 - 2 months. Please notice that may be paper submissions to Journal Pattingalloang the duration of the review process can be up to 3 months.

Reviewers examine the text of the aspects of quality and substance of the writing (not grammar texts), which includes the freshness, originality, usefulness and validity of citations and bibliography.

Reviewers received the manuscript double-blind review (anonymous author) of section editor or editorial secretariat. If it is not according to their competencies, the reviewer is entitled to refuse the manuscript and recommend it to others more competent reviewer. one article at least reviewed by a 2-3  reviewer.


Abstracting and Indexing

1. Base

2. Google Scholar


4. Scopus

5. Thomson

6. CroosRef/DOI

7. SJR


Author Guideline

Submission Guidelines

  1. Manuscript submitted should be between 3000-4000 words (including references, notes, and tables) in length.
  2. Manuscript should not have been published previously elsewhere in any from.
  3. Manuscript will be examined to avoid plagiarism.
  4. Manuscript is presented in the following components;

Title: it should preferably be no more than 14 words maximally. 14 size Times New Roman font.

Name of author(s): it should be typed below the title in Bold, 11 size, Times New Roman font without a degree and must not be shortened. Below the author’s name, it should be written area of expertise, name of institution, and email address.

Abstract: it should be no more than 200 words, typed in English in one paragraph summarizing your main points including research objective, research method, analysis techniques, and results of the research. It should be typed in Times New Roman front, single space, and written in italics.

Keyword: five keywords maximally separated by a comma, typed in double space below the abstract [11 size, Times New Roman font, singel space, and written in italics].

Introduction: it is typed in all capitals [bold, 12 size, Time New Roman font], The introduction is typed in capital letters, containing the background described with the previous state of the art research. At least 5 pieces of literature can be able to justify novelty, overcome a problem, urgency and rationalization of activities, literature review, problem-solving plan, and hypothesis development, analysis GAP, solution to problems, renewal of science, reference to primary sources, describe objectives and hypotheses at the end of the introduction [normal, 11 size, Times New Roman font].

Methods: it describes the approach used, object, variables or focus of the research, research location, population and sample/informant, instruments, data collection techniques, data analysistechniques [normal, 11 size, Times New Roman font].

Results and Discussion: the results of the research are presented completely including tables, graphics, and/or diagrams, and in accordance with the scope of the research. Table and graphics are numbered and titled. The results of the analysis are interpreted correctly. The discussion section is separate from the results, describing the findings logically, linking with relevant reference sources. The discussion section explains the findings logically and relates it to relevant reference sources. The discussion contains: what / how: whether the data presented has been processed (not the raw table) set out in the form of tables or images (choose one) and give comments, (why) the discussion section shows a link between the results obtained and the basic concepts and / or What else is there a match or contradiction with the results of other people's research, also explain the implications of the results of both theoretical and application research. [normal, 11 sizes, Times New Roman font]. [normal, 11 size, Times new Roman font].

Acknowledgments: Describe anyone who directly helps your research such as funders (an institution called non-personal), may be supplemented by the research contract number.

Conclusion and Suggestion: it sould be brief summary of the research. Conclusion is research finding which answers the research questions or research objectives. The results of the research provide suggestions/contribution on theapplication and/or development of knowledge [normal, 11 size, Times New Roman font].

References: it contains sources of references with at least 80% literature published in the last 5 years. The references should refer to the publication manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) fifth edition. All sources listed in the references must be in the article script using the reference application such as Mendeley, Zotero, AndNote

  1. Manuscript should be typed in the Microsoft Officed Word format, using 11 size, Time New Roman font, sigle space in A4 paper.
  2. If the paper is accepted for publication, author(s) will be asked to pay the article publication fee.
  3. People who are interested to purchase printed Journal Pattingalloang may contact tje journal management.
  4. All manuscript must be summitted electronically through the e-mail and address it to the editor: