Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal Daya Matematis is aiming to become the platform of the journal peer-review and authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on mathematics education and related topics. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees. Journal of mathematical power managed to be issued three times in each volume. Scope of the Journal Daya Matematis are:

1. Education: including the education system, curriculum, educational evaluation.
2. Math: including geometry, analysis, numerical methods, algebra etc.
3. Applied Mathematics / Science: including mathematical modeling, graph theory, fuzzy theory etc.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Journal Daya Matematis reviewing policies are:

  • Every submitted paper will be reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers.
  • Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (double blind review method).
  • Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references

 

Open Access Policy

center

 Journal Daya matematis  is a peer reviewed journal with open access. The article processing or delivery of the manuscript submitted to the manager or editor through an online system or by using the OJS Open Access publishing model.

In this publishing model, papers are peer-reviewed in the normal way under editorial control. The paper appears electronically and freely available from our website. Authors can also use articles that have been published in pdf format either for non-commercial use on a personal website or non-commercial institutions. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full text of articles JDM

 

Archiving

Jurnal Daya Matematis publication are deposited in multiple digital archives around the world to guarantee long­-term digital preservation.

These archives include:

  1. Indonesia one Search Perpusnas (National Library of the Indonesia)
  2. ISJD is an online directory database of Indonesian Lembaga
  3. LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Frekuency

Journal Daya Matematis is a Journal published online three years in March, July and December.

 

Petunjuk Penulisan Jurnal

Petunjuk bagi Penulis

Jurnal Daya Matematis

  1. Artikel yang dikirim ke jurnal daya matematis adalah hasil penelitian di bidang pendidikan matematika. Naskah diketik dengan program Microsoft Word, huruf Times New Roman, ukuran 12 pts, dengan spasi 1, dicetak pada kertas A4 maksimum 15-20 halaman, dan diserahkan dalam bentuk cetakan (print-out) juga langsung melalui website serta dapat juga melalui email:ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id
  2. Sistematika artikel adalah judul, nama penulis, nama lembaga penulis, abstrak disertai kata kunci, pendahuluan, metode penelitian, hasil dan pembahasan,penutup (kesimpulan dan saran) serta daftar pustaka.
  3. Judul dan abstrak ditulis dalam bahasa Inggris maksimum 15 kata. Nama penulis artikel dicantumkan tanpa gelar akademik, dan nama lembaga dan ditempatkan di bawah judul artikel. Apabila artikel ditulis oleh tim, penyunting hanya berhubungan dengan penulis utama atau penulis yang namanya tercantum pada urutan pertama.
  4. Abstrak dan kata kunci ditulis dalam bahasa Inggris. Panjang abstrak maksimum 150 kata, sedangkan jumlah kata kunci 3-5 kata.
  5. Bagian pendahuluan berisi latar belakang, konteks penelitian, hasil kajian pustaka, dan tujuan penelitian. Seluruh bagian pendahuluan disajikan secara terpadu dalam bentuk paragraf-paragraf, dengan panjang 15-20% dari total panjang artikel.
  6. Bagian  metode berisi paparan dalam bentuk paragraf tentang rancangan peneitian, sumber data, teknik pengumpulan data, dan analisis data yang secara nyata dilakukan oleh peneliti, dengan panjang 10-15% dari total panjang artikel.
  7. Bagian hasil penelitian dan pembahasan berisi paparan hasil analisis yang berkaitan dengan rumusan masalah. Setiap hasil penelitian harus dibahas. Pembahasan berisi pemaknaan hasil dan pembandingan dengan teori dan/atau hasil penelitian sejenis. Panjang paparan hasil dan pembahasan 40-60% dari total panjang artikel.
  8. Bagian simpulan berisi temuan peneitian yang berupa jawaban atas pertanyaan peneitian atau berupa intisari hasil pembahasan.
  9. Daftar rujukan hanya memuat sumber-sumber yang dirujuk, dan semua sumber yang dirujuk harus tercantum dalam daftar rujukan. Sumber rujukan minimal 80% berupa pustaka terbitan 10 tahun terakhir. Rujukan yang digunakan adalah sumber-sumber primer berupa artikel-artikel penelitian dalam jurnal atau laporan penelitian (termasuk skripsi, tesis, disertasi). 
  10. Perujukan dan pengutipan menggunakan teknik rujukan berkurung (nama akhir, tahun). Pencantuman sumber pada kutipan langsung hendaknya disertai keterangan tentang nomor halaman tempat asal kutipan. Contoh: (Davis, 2003: 47).
  11. Daftar Rujukan diurutkan secara alfabetis dan kronologis dengan tata cara seperti contoh berikut ini.

Buku:

Anderson, D.W., Vault, V.D., & Dickson, C.E. 1999. Problems and  Prospects for the Decades Ahead: Competency Based Teacher Education. Berkeley: McCutchan Pubishing Co.

Buku kumpulan artikel:

Saukah, A. & Waseso, M.G. (Eds.). 2002. Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Ilmiah (Edisi ke-4, cetakan ke-1). Malang: UM Press.

Artikel dalam buku kumpulan artikel:

Russel, T. 1998. An Alternative Conception: Representing Representation. Dalam P.J. Black & A. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s Informal Ideas in Science (hlm. 62-84). London: Routledge.

Artikel dalam jurnal atau majalah:

Kansil, C.L. 2002. Orientasi Baru Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan   Program Profesional dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Dunia Industri. Transpor, XX (4): 57-61.

Artikel dalam koran:

Pitunov, B. 13 Desember, 2002. Sekolah Unggulan ataukah Sekolah Pengunggulan? Majapahit Pos, hlm. 4 & 11.

Tulisan/berita dalam koran (tanpa nama pengarang):

Jawa Pos. 22 April, 1995. Wanita Kelas Bawah Lebih Mandiri, hlm. 3.

Dokumen resmi:

Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. 1978. Pedoman Penulisan Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 1990. Jakarta: PT Armas Duta Jaya.

Buku terjemahan:

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. 1976. Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan. Terjemahan oleh Arief Furchan. 1982. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, Laporan Peneitian:

Kuncoro, T. 1996. Pengembangan Kurikulum Pelatihan Magang di STM Nasional Malang Jurusan Bangunan, Program Studi Bangunan Gedung: Suatu Studi Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Dunia Usaha Jasa Konstruksi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS IKIP MALANG.

Makalah seminar, lokakarya, penataran:Waseso, M.G. 2001. Isi dan Format Jurnal Ilmiah. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Lokakarya Penulisan
Artikel dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Ilmiah, Universitas Lambungmangkurat, Banjarmasin, 9-11 Agustus.

Internet (artikel dalam jurnal online):

Kumaidi. 1998. Pengukuran Bekal Awal Belajar dan Pengembangan Tesnya. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. (Online), Jilid 5, No. 4, (http://www.malang.ac.id), diakses 20 Januari 2000.

Internet (bahan diskusi):

Wilson, D. 20 November 1995. Summary of Citing Internet Sites. NETTRAIN Discussion List, (Online), (NETTRAIN@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu), diakses 22 November 1995.

Internet (e-mail pribadi):

Naga, D.S. (ikip-jkt@indo.net.id). 1 Oktober 1997. Artikel untuk JIP. E-mail kepada Ali Saukah (jippsi@mlg.ywcn.or.id).

13. Tata cara penyajian kutipan, rujukan, tabel, dan gambar mengikuti ketentuan dalam Pedoman Penulisan  Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia yang Disempurnakan dan istilah-istilah yang dibakukan oleh Pusat Bahasa.

14. Semua naskah ditelaah secara anonim oleh mitra bebestari (reviewers) yang ditunjuk oleh penyunting menurut bidang kepakarannya. Penulis artikel diberi kesempatan untuk melakukan perbaikan (revisi) naskah atas dasar rekomendasi/ saran dari mitra bebestari atau penyunting. Kepastian pemuatan atau penolakan naskah akan diberitahukan secara tertulis/online di Open Journal System.

15. Segala sesuatu yang menyangkut perizinan pengutipan atau penggunaan software komputer untuk pembuatan naskah atau ihwal lain yang terkait dengan HaKI yang dilakukan oleh penulis artikel, berikut konsekuensi hukum yang mungkin timbul karenanya, menjadi tanggung jawab penuh penulis artikel.

16. Sebagai prasyarat bagi pemrosesan artikel, para penyumbang naskah wajib menjadi pelanggan minimal selama satu tahun (dua nomor). Penulis menerima nomor bukti pemuatan sebanyak 2 (dua) eksemplar dan cetak lepas sebanyak 1 (satu) eksemplar. Artikel yang tidak menjadi milik badan jurnal.

17. Reference dalam jurnal ini menggunakan aturan 

 

Admin,

Ramlan Mahmud

 

 

Article Progressing Charges

Every article submitted to Journal Daya Matematis have any 'Article Processing Charges'. This includes submitting, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving, and allows immediate access to the full text versions of the articles.

 

Plagiarism Check

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by Journal Daya Matematis Editorial Board using mendeley® Plagiarism Checker screening service powered by iThenticate

 

References Management

The author-year notation system is required and completed. All reference mentioned should be written down in reference using American Psychological Association (APA) style and arranged from A to Z. Articles have 10 recent references or over and 80% is journal. The most of references are primary ones (last ten years). Unpublished data and personal communication should not be cited as literature citations. “In Press” articles that have been accepted for publication may be cited in references. Include in the citation the journal in which the “in press” article will appear and the publication date, if a date is available.

 

Abstracting and indexing

Journal Daya Matematis has been covered by these following indexing services.

 

Publication Ethic

Journal Daya Matematis is a journal aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on education of mathematics as well as related topics that has neither been published elsewhere in any language, nor is it under review for publication anywhere. This following statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
  3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
  4. Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
  5. Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
  6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  7. Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  8. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use

Duties of Editor

  1. Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
  2. Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
  3. Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
  4. Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  2. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
  3. Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
  4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.  Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
  5. Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer

 

Peer Reviewer

  • Hamzah Upu, Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM), Indonesia
  • Sukmawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar (UNISMUH), Indonesia
  • Sutarto Hadi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (ULM), Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Yaya S. Kusumah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung, Indonesia
  • Zulkardi, University of Sriwijaya (UNSRI), Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Djaali, Universitas Negeri Jakarta (UNJ), Indonesia

 

Info & Charges

Authors should submit only papers that have been carefully proofread and polished. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they are the original or extended version of previously published papers in conferences and / or journals and that, if the work received an official sponsorship, it has been Duly released for open publication. Before submission please Make sure that your paper is prepared using the journal paper template. The authors must refer to Journal Daya Matematis for writing format and style (Please download and use as a template for the initial manuscript submission). This will Ensure fast processing and publication. Any papers not fulfilling the requirements based on the guidelines to authors will not be processed

charges

Article Submission charges Free

Article Processing charges (APCs) IDR 350.000 - 500.000

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.