EVALUASI PROGRAM PENGAWAS SMA NEGERI DI KOTA MAKASSAR

Zainal Zainal

Abstract


This study aims to determine the components of supervisory SMA program in Makassar consisting of: 1) Component inputs (antecedents); 2) The components of the process (transactionts); 3) Components of results (output). This study is the evaluation by using Stake's Countenance Model, subjects in this study is a school superintendent, coordinator of school supervisors, principals and teachers. Selection of informants in this study conducted by purposive sampling. Data was analyzed using descriptive and qualitative analysis through three grooves. Conclusion of the Program Supervisor Senior High School in the city of Makassar as follows: 1) Component inputs (antecedents), namely: (a) recruitment / appointment and administrative requirements of the supervisor High School, head of SMA is not yet fully meet the evaluation criteria, (b) subject teachers in SMA has been fully qualified S-1 but still there are teachers who do not teach according to the educational background of the S-1; 2) The components of the process (transactionts), namely: (a) control of a school supervisor in preparing the planning administration supervision is maximum, (b) the implementation of the supervision of the managerial to the principal adequate, but the implementation of academic supervision is considered inadequate, (c) the interaction between the Supervisory school principals well established, while the interaction between the school superintendent with the subject teachers in schools have not been well established; 3) components results (output), namely: (a) the effectiveness of managerial principals in the preparation of school programs and implement the eight National Education Standards still needs to be improved, (b) the effectiveness of managerial principals in the implementation of school programs are good, (c) increase the capacity subject teachers in preparing lesson plans and PBM implementation is still low.

Keywords


Program Evalaution; STAKE’s Model.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2003. Dasar-dasar evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar, 2009. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan.Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara.

B. Laura, C.M. Carper, & W. Virginia, 2011. The Sociology of Educational Supervision and Evaluation: Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education Vol. 4, No 1 (24-33).

C. Fritz, 2003. Supervisory Options for Instructional Leaders in Education. Journal of Leadership Education, Volume 2, Issue 2.

Djaali, Puji Mulyono & Ramli, 2000. Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PPs UNJ.

Djemari, Mardapi, 2008. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia.

Mantja W, 2001. Organisasi dan Hubungan Kerja Pengawas Pendidikan. Makalah disampaikan dalam Rapat Konsultasi Pengawasan antara Inspektorat Jenderal Departemen Pendidikan Nasional dengan Badan Pengawasan Daerah di Solo, Solo,tanggal 24 - 28 September.

M, A. Muliati, 2008. ”Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Sistem Ganda (PSG). Suatu Penelitian Evaluatif Berdasarkan Stake’s Countenance Model Mengenai Program Pendidikan sistem Ganda pada sebuah SMK di Sulawesi Selatan.” Disertasi .Tidak diterbitkan. Jakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Moleong, Lexy J, 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pandong, A, 2003. Tugas Pokok dan Fungsi Pengawas. Badan Diklat Depdagri & Diklat Depdiknas.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor: 12 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Pengawas Sekolah/Madrasah.

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor: 21 Tahun 2010 Tentang Jabatan Fungsiopnal Pengawas Sekolah dan Angka Kreditnya.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor: 28 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penugasan Guru Sebagai Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor: 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor: 74 Tahun 2008 Tentang Guru

Putra, Nusa, 2011. Penelitian Kualitatif: Proses dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT.Indeks

Robins, S.P,1984. Management: Concepts and Practices. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Ruslan, 2009. Validasi isi, Buletin Pa’biritta No. 10 Tahun IV, 18-19, September

Sahertian, P.A.,1987. Prinsip dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan.Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Sudaryono, 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Sudjana,Nana.,Rahmat.,Tita Lestari., Endang Abutarya., Daliman Sofyan., Darwis., M.Thayeb., Kahar Yoes, dkk, 2011. Buku Kerja Pengawas Sekolah. Jakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Tenaga Kependidikan, Badan PSDM dan PMP Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Sudjana, Nana, 2001. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, Nana, 2012. Pengawas dan Kepengawasan: Memahami Tugas pokok, fungsi, peran dan tanggung Jawab Pengawas Sekolah. Cikarang Bekasi: Binamitra Publishing.

Sudjana, Nana, 2012. Supervisi Pendidikan: Konsep dan Aplikasinya Bagi Pengawas Sekolah. Cikarang Bekasi: Binamitra Publishing.

S. Susan & G. Jeffrey, 2000. Alternative Approaches to Supervision: Cases from the Field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision. Volume 15. Number 3 (212-235).

S.Nasution, 2003. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf, 2000. Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf, 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan danPenelitian. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, 1992. Analisis data kualitatif, Terjemahan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Widoyoko, S. Eko Putro,2012. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wirawan, 2009. Evaluasi Kinerja sumber daya Manusia: Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 109 times
PDF - 60 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.