Lecturer’s Attitude towards Advance Technology and Its Impact to the Learning Process: Case study in Tangerang City Campuses

Harisa Mardiana

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/est.v4i1.4974


This research aimed to determine the qualifications of lecturers in the field of social science depended on the use of advance technology, especially the power points, the Internet, and social media site. The problem that some of the lecturers preferred to use the traditional way of teaching, such as whiteboard and marker, lectures. This study research was to observe the categories of lecturers’ knowledge, ages and gender in using technology in the classroom. Also we sought lecturers’ difficulty in using technology to conduct the teaching and learning process in the classroom. The research design in this study was a quantitative method, with giving questionnaires to 107 lecturers in Tangerang City campuses. Data collection technique was taken by conducting observation, questionnaires and interview and data analysis. The result of this study research showed that there are 5 categories of lecturers’ attitudes towards advance technology based on their knowledge, ages and gender. And the purpose of the study research is to give an opportunity to increase lecturers’ qualifications for 2st century learning process and to leverage advance technology in campuses which it is to deliver contents and to engage students and lecturers learning process in ways not previously possible.


quality of lecturers; advanced technology; lecturers’ categories; teaching and learning process

Full Text:



Associates, G. (2003). Schools and the internet. Still Spring Ct, Bethesda, MD: Grundwald Associates.

Atkinson, R., & Wilmot, S. (2001). Can multimedia meet tertiary educational needs better than the conventional lecture? A case study. Australian Journal of Educational Technology , 17(1), 1-20.

Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007, 11 01). Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking. California Management Review, Volume 50 No.1 , pp. 29-31.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn; Brain, Mind and Experiece. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002, November 2). Barrier to adopting Technology for Teaching and Learning. Educause Quarterly, Number 2 , pp. 50-62.

Center, A. f. (2014). The five core competencies of the competence profile of a beginning lecturer at a university of applied sciences . VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT AMSTERDAM.

Chapman, D. W., & Mählck, L. O. (2004). Adapting technology for school improvement: a global perspective. In V. L. Suguri, M. d. Matos, N. M. de Resende e Castro, R. v. Guimarães de Castro, L. M. da Silva Jung, & E. Rusten, Chapter 10 The pedagogical uses of web-based chat: the Brazilian experience (p. 224). Paris : International Institute for Educational Planning ; UNESCO .

Chapman, D. W., Garret, A., & Mahlck, L. O. (2004). The Role of Technology in School Improvement. In Cha, D. W. Chapman, & L. O. Malck, Adapting Technology for School Improvement: A Global Perspective (p. 23). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitude. Journal of Educaitonal Computing Research, 2. , 265-281.

Dalker, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. P. 168. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann.

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice . Oxford OX2 8DP, UK: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann P-20.

de Moura Castro, C. (2004). Are new technologies better technologies? For whom? In W. D. Chapman, & O. L. Mählck, Adapting Technology for School Improvement: A Global Perspective (p. 42). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

DIKTI, K. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 44. Jakarta: PERMENRISTEKDIKTI-NOMOR-44-TAHUN-2015-TENTANG-SNPT-SALINAN.pd.

Dini. (2015, October 28). Dampak Positif dan Negatif Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Retrieved from DosenIT.com: http://dosenit.com/kuliah-it/teknologi-informasi/dampak-positif-dan-negatif-penggunaan-teknologi-informasi-dan-komunikasi

Goswami, A., & Dutta, S. (2016). Gender Differences in Technology Usage—A Literature Review. Open Journal of Business and Management 4 , 51-59.

Graham, D. (2016, December 7). Paid With Compliment, Not Cash. Jakarta, DKI, Indonesia.

Guerriero, S. (2013). INNOVATIVE TEACHING FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING . Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Haryanto, W. (2017, February 12). How to Teach Well in the Classroom and the Use of ICT. (H. Mardiana, Interviewer)

Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers' perception of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: a national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly , 312-333.

Isman, A. (2004). Attitudes of Students Towards Computers. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology , 3(1),2.

Joye, S. W., & Wilson, J. H. (2015). Professor Age and Gender Affect Student Perceptions and Grades. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 15, , pp.126-138.

King, A. E. (2002). Gender Mainstream an Overview. New York: United Nation.

Kneale, P. (2009). Teaching and Learning for Employability. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall, A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 99-112). New York: Routledge.

Kpolovie, P. J., & Awusaku, O. K. (2016). ICT ADOPTION ATTITUDE OF LECTURERS. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Vol.4, No.5 , 9-57.

Mählck, L. O., & Chapman, D. W. (2004). Chapter 14: Effective use of technology to improve education: lessons for planners. In D. O. Chapman, & L. O. Mählck, Adapting technology for school improvement:a global perspective (p. 298). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6. , 1017-1054.

Motamedi, V. (2012, March 24). Integration of technology in our classrooms: A divisive issue. Tehran, Iran 15614.

Nandika, D., Priowirjanto, G. H., & Soekartawi. (2007). Integrating ICT for Better Quality and Values of Education: LESSON FROMINDONESIA. Bali, Indonesia: Special Duty Officer of the Ministry of National Education.

Nentl, N., & Zietlow, R. (2008). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to Teach Critical Thinking Skills to Business Students. College and Undergraduate Libraries Vol. 15 Issue 1-2 , Pages 159-172 .

Olafare, F. O., Adeyanju, L. O., & Fakorede, S. O. (2017). Colleges of Education Lecturers Attitude Towards the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences Volume5 - Issue 4 , 1-12.

Onasanya, S. A., Shehu, R. A., Oduwaiye, R. O., & Shehu, L. A. (2010). Higher Institutions Lecturers’ Attitude Towards Integration of ICT into Teaching and Research in Nigeria. Research Journal of Information Technology 2 , 1-10.

Purcel, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friendrich, L. (2013, February 28). Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved from PEW RESEARCH CENTER: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/28/how-teachers-are-using-technology-at-home-and-in-their-classrooms/

Region, H. D. (2009). Indonesia: Higher Education Financing. Jakarta: Document of World Bank.

Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnic, M. (2016). Design Environments for Creative Collaboration. Supporting Diverse and Creative Collaboration in the Scratch Online Community , 10.

Rules and Regulation, I. G. (2009). Bagian Kesepuluh: Kebebasan Akademik, Kebebasan Mimbar Akademik, dan Otonomi Keilmuan. Retrieved from Pasal 28 No.2 PP 37 Tahun 2009 Page 23: http://sipma.ui.ac.id/files/dokumen/U_DOSEN/PP%2037%20Tahun%202009%20DOSEN.pdf

Starr, L. (2017, April 20). Encouraging Teacher Technology Use. Retrieved from Educational World: http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech159.shtml

Talisayon, S. D. (2008). Part IV: Concluding Observations. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.

Vermunt, J. D. (1998, June 13). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Volum 68 Issue 2 , pp. 149-171.

Waitayankoon, P. (2007). ICT. In S. Tinsiri, ICT in Teacher Education: Case Studies from the Asia-Pacif ic Region (pp. 110-115). Bangkok: United Nations Educational, Scientif ic and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Webster, M. D. (2017). Mediated Communication, Cooperative/ Collaborative Learning and Mediated Communication, Cooperative/ Collaborative Learning and Mediated Communication, Cooperative/ Philosophy of Technology Assumption in Educational Technology Leadership. Taiwan: National Sun Yat-sen University Volume 20 No.1 .

Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. (2012). Gender Difference of Confidence in Using Technology for Learning. The Journal of Technology Studies , 74-79.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 61 times
PDF - 41 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Harisa Mardiana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Published by:

Graduate Program
Universitas Negeri Makassar
Alamat : Jalan Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 .Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia
Phone: 085299898201

Email: jurnalestunm@gmail.com dan est.journal@unm.ac.id

e-ISSN : 2477-3840

p-ISSN : 2460-1497


Creative Commons License
Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


EST UNM Indexed by


   Flag Counter              


View My EST UNM Stats