Geometry Skill Analysis In Problem Solving Reviewed From The Difference Of Cognitive Style Students Junior High School

Andi Saparuddin Nur(1*), Evy Nurvitasari(2),

(1) Universitas Musamus, Marauke
(2) Universitas Musamus, Marauke
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v3i3.4130

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the geometry skills in solving problems in terms of cognitive styles differences in the students of SMP Negeri Urumb. The type of this research is descriptive research that is qualitative with case study approach. The subject of this research is all students of SMP Negeri Urumb. Subject selection is done by using snowball sampling technique. The main instrument in this study is the researchers themselves and accompanied by supporting instruments such as diagnostic tests, geometry solving test, and interview guides. Validity and reliability of data is done through credibility test, transferability test, dependability test, and confirmability test. Data analysis consists of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results of this study were (1) reflective FI subjects showing visual, verbal, drawing, and logic skills with level of geometry thinking at level 2 (informal deduction); (2) impulsive FI subjects exhibiting visual, verbal, and drawing skills with geometric thinking level at level 1 (analysis), (3) reflective FD subjects exhibit visual skills, and draw with level of geometric thinking at level 0 (visualization), and (4) impulsive FD subjects exhibit visual, verbal skills with geometric level thinking at level 0 (visualization).


Keywords


geometry skill; problem solving; cognitive style.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary,D. Jacob, L.C. Sorensen, C. Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education Eight Edition. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Balitbang Depdiknas. (2007). Ringkasan Studi PISA. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Effendi, A. Sjarkawi. Asrial. (2011). Pengaruh Interaksi Media dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Bangun Datar dan Bangun Ruang. Jurnal Tekno-Pedagogi. Volume 1, No. 2. Hal 15-26.

Ibrahim, M., Zainuddin., Johari., & Winnie. (2004). Relationship between cognitive styles, level of cognitive thinking and chemistry achievement among form four science students. Johor bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Muhassanah, N. Sujadi, I. Riyadi. (2014). Analisis Keterampilan Geometri Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tingkat Berpikir Van Hiele. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. Volume 2, No. 1. Hal 54-66.

Musser, G. Burger, W. Peterson, B. (2008). Mathematics For Elementary Teacher: A Contemporary Approach Eight Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA: The National Council of Teacher Mathematics Inc.

Permendiknas No.22. (2006). Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemdiknas.

Purnomo, D.J. Asikin, M. Junaedi, I. (2015). Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Pada Geometri Siswa Kelas VII Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dalam Setting Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education. Volume 4, No. 2. Hal 109-115.

Rahman, A. (2008). Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif Secara Psikologis dan Konseptual Tempo Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Volume 14, No.2. hal 452-473.

Rahmatina, S. Sumarmo, U. Johar, R. (2014). Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika. Volume 1, No.1. Hal 62-70..

Tjalla, A. (2010). Potret Mutu Pendidikan Indonesia Ditinjau dari Hasil-Hasil Studi Internasional. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam seminar temu ilmiah nasional guru II Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta, 23 November 2010.

Warli. (2010). Profil Kreativitas Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Disertasi tidak dipubliskasikan. Surabaya: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Winkel, WS. (2012). Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.

Van De Walle. (2013). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching and Developmentally Eight Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 710 times | PDF view : 175 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Andi Saparuddin Nur, and Evy Nurvitasari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar

   

address icon red

 Jl Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia  
  jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id 
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index 
   085299898201 (WA) 
 

EST Index by: