ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION ABILITIES AND MATHEMATICS LOGIC THINKING IN GENERATIVE LEARNING WITH SCIENTIFIC APPROACH OF CLASS XI STUDENTS MAJORING IN HEALTH ANALYS AT SMK KESEHATAN MEGA REZKY IN MAKASSAR

A.Wiwik Pratiwi Fujiwijaya

Abstract


The research is a combination of quantitative-qualitative (mixed method). The design of mixed method used is Concurrent Triangulation Design aims to describe be communication ability and mathematics logic thinking of students in generative learning and to discover the improvement of communication ability and mathematics logic thinking of students in generative learning of class XI students Majoring in Health Analys at SMK Kesehatan Mega Rezky in Makassar. The population of the research were all of the students in class XI at SMK Kesehatan Mega Rezky in Makassar. The sample consisted of one class, namely class XI Majoring in Helath Analys as the experiment class taught by using generative learning model chosen by using random sampling technique. The subjects of the research were three students consisted of one student with high mathematics ability, one student with medium mathematics ability, and one student with low mathematics abilitiy. The data of research consisted of mathematics communication data and mathematics logic thinking ability data. The instruments used in collecting the data were mathematics communication ability test, mathematics logic thinking ability test, learning implementation observation sheet, and interview guidance. The data of mathematics communication ability and mathematics logic thinking were analyzed by using descriptive and inferensial analysis and analyzed qualitatitvely. The results of the research reveal that : (1) the implementation of generative learning model in Circumference nd Area of Two Dimensional Figure material is well implemented, (2) the improvement of students’ communication abilities after being taught by implementing generative learning model with average 0.63 is in medium classification, (3) the improvement of students’ mathematics logic thinking abilities after being taught by implementing generative learning model with average 0.59 is in medium classification, (4) mathematics communication ability in generative learning such as the subject who have high, medium, and low mathematics abilities have ability to state mathematics ideas in writing and drawing it, although the picture/sketch made by the subjects with high and low mathematics ability are still not correct. Then, the subject who have high, medium, and low mathematics abilities have ability to interpret and evaluate mathematics ideas in writing although the subject who have high, medium, and low mathematics ability can only write most of the reason/proof which are correct. Moreover, the subjects who have high, medium, and low mathematics abilities also have in using terms, mathematics notations, and its structures to model mathematics situation or problem, although the subjects who have medium and low mathematics abilities can only write most of terms, notations, and mathematics structure correctly, (5) mathematics logic thinking ability in generative learning such as the subjects who have high, medium, and low mathematics ability have ability in thinking orderly, namely the subject with high, medium and low mathematics abilities write the acknoledged information and are questioned in question items completely and correctly, and write correct formulation to solve the problems. Then, the subjects who have high, medium, and low mathematics abilities have argument ability, namely student can write reason/proof in deciding solving stages which can be used to answer questions, although the subjects with medium and low mathematics abilities write the reason which still is not correct but the subjects can solve the questions correctly. Then, the subject with high, medium, and low mathematics abilities have ability to write formulation of conclusion by using their own languages based on the purpose of the question and answer correctly.

Keywords


Communication Ability; Mathematics Logic Thinking; Generative Learning; Scientific Approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfina dan M.Rahmad.2007. Hasil Belajar Keterampilan Social Sains Fisika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Generative Pada Siswa Kelas VIII B MTS Dar EL Hikmah. Pekanbaru : Jurnal Geliga Sains, 1(2), 25-30

Andriawan Budi dan Mega Teguh Budiarto. 2014. Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas VIII-1 SMP Negeri 2 Sidoarjo. Mathedunesa. Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan matematika, (online),Vol. 3 No.2, (http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id 8,Diakses tanggal 4 November 2015)

Depdiknas. 2004. Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Fajar Marhaeni. 2009. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori Dan Praktik,. Yogyakarta :Graha ilmu

Haling, Abdul. 2007. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Makassar : Badan Penerbit UNM Makassar

Jazuli, Akhmad. 2009. Berfikir Kreatif dalam Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika.Makalah disampaikan dalam seminar nasional, pada tanggal 5 Desember 2009, di Yogyakarta (diakses tanggal 23 Oktober2015)

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Konsep Pendekatan Saintifik. (Powerpoint).Jakarta : Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Kholil, A. 2008. Pembelajaran Generatif (MPG) (online). Tersedia : http:anwarholil.blogspot com/2008/04/pembelajaran generative.mpg.html (diakses tanggal 3 November 2015)

Maryani, Ika dan Laila Fatmawati.2015. Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar (Teori dan Praktik).Yogyakarta : Deepublish

Mundiri.2000. Logika. Jakarta: Grasindo

Napitupulu, Ester Lince. 2012. Prestasi Sains dan Matematika Indonesia Menurun. (online), Kompas http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/,Diakses tanggal 3 November 2015

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Prinsiples and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM

Roestiyah, N,K. 2008. Strategi Belajar Menagajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Saragih, Sahat. 2006. Menumbuhkembangkan Berpikir Logis dan Sikap Positif terhadap Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. Jurnal pendidikan dan kebudayaan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (551-565).Jakarta : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Depdiknas.

Susanto, Ahmad. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Prenada media Group

Syafmen Wardi dan Rahayu Hertina.2014. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Siswa Gaya Belajar Tipe Thinking Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Batanghari :Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 4(2), 153-158,

Tiro.M.A. 2008. Bagaimana Aku Berpikir ? Edisi Kedua. Makassar: Andira Publisher

Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi,dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara

Uno, Hamzah B. 2006. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara

Wena, M. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif. Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v4i2.2900

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 226 times | PDF view : 564 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 A.Wiwik Pratiwi Fujiwijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Master Program of Mathematics Education

Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Makassar

ramlan.mm@unm.ac.id

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

View My Stats